Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

News

Systematic review found that exercise interventions improve muscle quality in older adults

Muscle quality maintenance or improvement is important for older adults to preserve or enhance physical function and metabolic health. There is conflicting evidence on whether exercise interventions improve morphological muscle quality (structure) and neuromuscular muscle quality (strength) in older adults. Further it is unclear which characteristics of exercise and for which populations, lead to greatest change in muscle quality. This systematic review aimed to estimate the effects of exercise interventions compared to non-active control on muscle quality in older adults.

A protocol that was specified a priori guided the methods. Sensitive searches performed in six databases, three grey literature databases, and citation tracking were used to identify randomised controlled trials that were published in English, Portuguese or Spanish. Participants were older adults (≥60 years) without a chronic condition. Interventions were supervised or unsupervised exercise interventions combined or not with nutritional programs. The comparators were mostly non-active interventions, but also included light physical activity (stretching or walking) or an educational control. The primary outcomes were morphological and neuromuscular muscle quality outcomes of the lower limb.

Two independent reviewers selected trials for inclusion, evaluated risk of bias and extracted data. Any disagreements were resolved by consensus discussions or by a third reviewer. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Certainty of evidence was not evaluated. Meta-analysis was used to pool the included trials to calculate standardised mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Six subgroup analyses were conducted when data was available; (1) older adults subgroups (e.g., physically healthy, obese, mobility-limited, sarcopenic, frail); (2) exercise delivery modes (e.g., supervised vs. unsupervised exercise programs); (3) intervention modalities (e.g., resistance exercise, aerobic exercise, combined resistance and aerobic exercise, water-based exercise prescription, exercise plus nutritional supplementation); (4) outcomes assessment (e.g., muscle echo intensity, intermuscular adipose tissue); (5) thigh versus calf muscle outcomes (or knee extensors vs. plantar flexors); and (6) based on risk of bias assessment.

21 trials (973 participants) were included in the meta-analyses. Participants had a median age of 70 years (IQR 67-75), were women (n=651, 67%), had a BMI of 27.5 kg/m2 (IQR 25.5–28.4). Most trials (n=15, 71%) included physically healthy older adults and compared to non-active intervention groups (n=12, 57%). Compared to control, participants in the exercise groups had a small improvement in morphological muscle quality (SMD 0.32; 95% CI 0.13 to 0.51; 10 trials; 387 participants) at follow-up. Compared to control, participants in the exercise groups had a small improvement in neuromuscular muscle quality (SMD 0.49; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.69; 13 trials; 482 participants) at follow-up. Both results varied when investigated in subgroup analyses.

Exercise interventions provide small improvements in both morphological and neuromuscular muscle quality compared to control. It is unclear whether these improvements in muscle quality translate to meaningful changes in patient relevant outcomes.

Read more on PEDro.

Radaelli, R., Taaffe, D.R., Newton, R.U. et al. Exercise effects on muscle quality in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 11, 21085 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00600-3

Sign up to the PEDro Newsletter to receive the latest news